Home > Global Warming, Libtard, Ne0-Malthusian > Neo-Malthusian and an Enviro-Terrorist: Global Warming Hysteria Will Breed Violence

Neo-Malthusian and an Enviro-Terrorist: Global Warming Hysteria Will Breed Violence


Eco-Terrorism has been around for a while now. There will always be people who put more value in a tree or a whale than in human life.

The recent events at the Discovery Channel building should put a lot more focus on the more extreme, and violent wing of Environmentalism.

Here was  man James J. Lee, who after watching ALGORES movie, had some sort of epiphany. He saw humans as the problem. His solution, kill people.

Humans are the most destructive, filthy, pollutive creatures around and are wrecking what’s left of the planet with their false morals and breeding culture.

For every human born, ACRES of wildlife forests must be turned into farmland in order to feed that new addition over the course of 60 to 100 YEARS of that new human’s lifespan! THIS IS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FOREST CREATURES!!!! All human procreation and farming must cease!

It is the responsiblity of everyone to preserve the planet they live on by not breeding any more children who will continue their filthy practices. Children represent FUTURE catastrophic pollution whereas their parents are current pollution. NO MORE BABIES! Population growth is a real crisis. Even one child born in the US will use 30 to a thousand times more resources than a Third World child. It’s like a couple are having 30 babies even though it’s just one! If the US goes in this direction maybe other countries will too!

There is no question that most reasonable people would think this guy is nuts. What scares me are the people who agree with him. Lee’s rant is basically the same shill rants we have been hearing from Environmentalists for years now. Paul Ehrlich wants to depopulated the earth. James Hanson wants to depopulated the earth. White House science czar John Holdren’s Ecoscience textbook, calls for a “planetary regime” to carry out forced abortions and mandatory sterilization procedures. Creator of the Gaia hypothesis James Lovelock told the Guardian earlier this year that “democracy must be put on hold” to combat global warming and that “a few people with authority” should be allowed to run the planet.

Reading Lee’s diatribe, and you should find remarkable parallels between that and Dr. Eric R. Pianka’s diatribe in 2006.

Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.

He then showed solutions for reducing the world’s population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved.

Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets.

AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s population is airborne Ebola ( Ebola Reston ), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. However, Professor Pianka did not mention that Ebola victims die a slow and torturous death as the virus initiates a cascade of biological calamities inside the victim that eventually liquefy the internal organs.

After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, “We’ve got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.”

Whats the difference? James Lee went through with his threats. Dr. Pianka just talked about his on the lecture circuit. Now compare Lee’s rant with Sea Sheppard’s Paul Watson.

We need to radically and intelligently reduce human populations to fewer than one billion. We need to eliminate nationalism and tribalism and become Earthlings. And as Earthlings, we need to recognize that all the other species that live on this planet are also fellow citizens and also Earthlings. This is a planet of incredible diversity of life-forms; it is not a planet of one species as many of us believe.

We need to stop burning fossil fuels and utilize only wind, water, and solar power with all generation of power coming from individual or small community units like windmills, waterwheels, and solar panels.

Sea transportation should be by sail. The big clippers were the finest ships ever built and sufficient to our needs. Air transportation should be by solar powered blimps when air transportation is necessary.

All consumption should be local. No food products need to be transported over hundreds of miles to market. All commercial fishing should be abolished. If local communities need to fish the fish should be caught individually by hand.

Preferably vegan and vegetarian diets can be adopted. We need to eliminate herds of ungulates like cows and sheep and replace them with wild ungulates like bison and caribou and allow those species to fulfill the proper roles in nature. We need to restore the prey predator relationship and bring back the wolf and the bear. We need the large predators and ungulates, not as food, but as custodians of the land that absorbs the carbon dioxide and produces the oxygen. We need to live with them in mutual respect.

We need to remove and destroy all fences and barriers that bar wildlife from moving freely across the land. We need to lower populations of domestic housecats and dogs. Already the world’s housecats consume more fish than all the world’s seals and we have made the cow into the largest aquatic predator on the planet because more than one half of all fish taken from the sea is converted into meal for animal feed.

We need to stop flying, stop driving cars, and jetting around on marine recreational vehicles. The Mennonites survive without cars and so can the rest of us.

Of course note how much of a hypocrite Watson is, last time I checked his boats weren’t running by sail only.

The fact of the matter is, to environmentalists, these are the kinds of “solutions” they are talking about. They want billions of people to die, so they can live in their GAIA paradise. I expect to see more and more of these eco-attacks by people like Lee. They listen to wackos like Watson, Gore, Ehrlich, and Pianka. Frankly I’m more terrified by these people than any Muslim-terrorist.

Advertisements
  1. yttik
    September 5, 2010 at 18:23

    Scary stuff. I wish these creeps would wake up to the fact that people are part of the ecosystem. We’re entwined with nature. You take people away and other parts of the system suffer. We aren’t an alien species or a noxious weed, we’re part of the planet.

  2. September 13, 2010 at 19:10

    I wonder if these guys ever looked at birth rates vs. income? If they did, they might have another epiphany. The best way to reduce birth rates is from increasing income and the best way to increase income is capitalism.

  3. Planet Earth
    December 23, 2010 at 09:38

    I think these guys should act on what they believe, and start with themselves. If Pianka, Erlich, Lee, Watson and the like would just eliminate themselves, not only would they set an example for the rest of the scientific community to follow, but they would also be a first step toward stopping overpopulation of destructive, filthy, pollutive creatures like themselves. Just think of the carbon footprint that would be reduced by these guys getting rid of themselves. And perhaps they can donate themselves to science, too, and chose ebola as the way to exit this life while allowing their fellow science comrades to study the full effects of ebola. The rest of the scientists too cowardly to put their own words into action by starting with themselves, should just castrate themselves. That way, we can put a stop to their reproduction for good. And they’ll never get prostate cancer, too, saving the healthcare system alot of money.

    • December 29, 2010 at 11:09

      I’m sympathetic to what your saying, but I don’t wish anyone any ill. It would be nice if they weren’t so hypocritical, but if they weren’t hypocrites then it would be harder for people to see how crazy they are.

      Though I would point out that the reason they don’t practice what they preach is because they really don’t believe what they are preaching. They only say that stuff because they want to be the ones in control (megalomania) or ones everyone looks to for expert advice (Narcissism).

  1. November 17, 2010 at 11:46

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: