Archive

Archive for the ‘Global Warming’ Category

February 7, 2011 3 comments

So how can Global Warming cause both a decline in snow fall and an increase of snow fall? Well that’s easy. The Warmists will say anything to sell their apocalyptic vision on the future.

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past (2000)

However, the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.

“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said.

The effects of snow-free winter in Britain are already becoming apparent. This year, for the first time ever, Hamleys, Britain’s biggest toyshop, had no sledges on display in its Regent Street store. “It was a bit of a first,” a spokesperson said.

I don’t really need to post anything from 2011 do I? Okay I will

Yes, global warming could mean more snow (2011)

In fact, scientists have been warning for at least two decades that global warming could make snowstorms more severe. Snow has two simple ingredients: cold and moisture. Warmer air collects moisture like a sponge until it hits a patch of cold air. When temperatures dip below freezing, a lot of moisture creates a lot of snow.

So when in doubt always blame global warming.

 

Advertisements
Categories: Global Warming

Epic moments of AGW nuttiness: LSU Professor and Nukes

November 17, 2010 2 comments

Got to love it when a college professor tries to use scare tactics and fear-mongering to push their partisan agenda on their students.

It ties in nicely to a previous post, that the real threat comes from teachers like these, that use their academic clout for indoctrination rather than teaching.

How stupid are AGW fanatics? This stupid….

October 6, 2010 4 comments

AGW-child-noose

Methinks they are 5 cans short of a six-pack

Really? I mean really? Check out the website for Act-Respsonsible.org. I wonder how long that will be up? As of 12:33 pm EST it’s there….any bets on when it will be mysteriously erased?

What a great day to start of October!

October 1, 2010 7 comments

Not only did Rick Sanchez finally get fired.

But the Global Warming fanatics are showing their true colors.

Make sure you watch the whole thing. Now you know how the loony lefty Greenies think about everyone that doesn’t join in on their groupthink circle jerk.

The moral of this story. Greenies would rather kill kids than give up on Global Warming hysteria.

Global Climate Disruption? WTF?!?

September 18, 2010 2 comments

This from the Telegraph.

President Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren is worried about global warming. Having noticed that there hasn’t actually been any global warming since 1998, he feels it ought to be called “global climate disruption” instead. That way whether it gets warmer or colder, wetter or drier, less climatically eventful or more climatically eventful, the result will be the same: it can all be put down to “global climate disruption.”

I call this chicken fuckery to the fullest extent. This is typical behavior for many on the Left. They are in danger of losing a debate, so they try to change the terms.

They did it once already, changing “Global Warming” to “Climate Change”. Now they are trying to do it again?

And that will be good, because it will give Holdren the excuse to introduce all the draconian measures he has long believed necessary if “global climate disruption” is to be averted: viz, state-enforced population control; a rewriting of the legal code so that trees are able to sue people; and the wholesale destruction of  the US economy (“de-development” as he put it in the 1973 eco-fascist textbook he co-wrote Paul and Anne Ehrlich Human Ecology: Global Problems And Solutions).

Holdren is not the only person having problems with the “world not warming and everyone growing increasingly sceptical” issue. So too is Dave “Grocer” Cameron’s excuse for a government. Its solution? Work out ways of brainwashing the populace with state-funded propaganda

Categories: Global Warming, Libtard

Neo-Malthusian and an Enviro-Terrorist: Global Warming Hysteria Will Breed Violence

September 5, 2010 5 comments

Eco-Terrorism has been around for a while now. There will always be people who put more value in a tree or a whale than in human life.

The recent events at the Discovery Channel building should put a lot more focus on the more extreme, and violent wing of Environmentalism.

Here was  man James J. Lee, who after watching ALGORES movie, had some sort of epiphany. He saw humans as the problem. His solution, kill people.

Humans are the most destructive, filthy, pollutive creatures around and are wrecking what’s left of the planet with their false morals and breeding culture.

For every human born, ACRES of wildlife forests must be turned into farmland in order to feed that new addition over the course of 60 to 100 YEARS of that new human’s lifespan! THIS IS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FOREST CREATURES!!!! All human procreation and farming must cease!

It is the responsiblity of everyone to preserve the planet they live on by not breeding any more children who will continue their filthy practices. Children represent FUTURE catastrophic pollution whereas their parents are current pollution. NO MORE BABIES! Population growth is a real crisis. Even one child born in the US will use 30 to a thousand times more resources than a Third World child. It’s like a couple are having 30 babies even though it’s just one! If the US goes in this direction maybe other countries will too!

There is no question that most reasonable people would think this guy is nuts. What scares me are the people who agree with him. Lee’s rant is basically the same shill rants we have been hearing from Environmentalists for years now. Paul Ehrlich wants to depopulated the earth. James Hanson wants to depopulated the earth. White House science czar John Holdren’s Ecoscience textbook, calls for a “planetary regime” to carry out forced abortions and mandatory sterilization procedures. Creator of the Gaia hypothesis James Lovelock told the Guardian earlier this year that “democracy must be put on hold” to combat global warming and that “a few people with authority” should be allowed to run the planet.

Reading Lee’s diatribe, and you should find remarkable parallels between that and Dr. Eric R. Pianka’s diatribe in 2006.

Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.

He then showed solutions for reducing the world’s population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved.

Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets.

AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s population is airborne Ebola ( Ebola Reston ), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. However, Professor Pianka did not mention that Ebola victims die a slow and torturous death as the virus initiates a cascade of biological calamities inside the victim that eventually liquefy the internal organs.

After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, “We’ve got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.”

Whats the difference? James Lee went through with his threats. Dr. Pianka just talked about his on the lecture circuit. Now compare Lee’s rant with Sea Sheppard’s Paul Watson.

We need to radically and intelligently reduce human populations to fewer than one billion. We need to eliminate nationalism and tribalism and become Earthlings. And as Earthlings, we need to recognize that all the other species that live on this planet are also fellow citizens and also Earthlings. This is a planet of incredible diversity of life-forms; it is not a planet of one species as many of us believe.

We need to stop burning fossil fuels and utilize only wind, water, and solar power with all generation of power coming from individual or small community units like windmills, waterwheels, and solar panels.

Sea transportation should be by sail. The big clippers were the finest ships ever built and sufficient to our needs. Air transportation should be by solar powered blimps when air transportation is necessary.

All consumption should be local. No food products need to be transported over hundreds of miles to market. All commercial fishing should be abolished. If local communities need to fish the fish should be caught individually by hand.

Preferably vegan and vegetarian diets can be adopted. We need to eliminate herds of ungulates like cows and sheep and replace them with wild ungulates like bison and caribou and allow those species to fulfill the proper roles in nature. We need to restore the prey predator relationship and bring back the wolf and the bear. We need the large predators and ungulates, not as food, but as custodians of the land that absorbs the carbon dioxide and produces the oxygen. We need to live with them in mutual respect.

We need to remove and destroy all fences and barriers that bar wildlife from moving freely across the land. We need to lower populations of domestic housecats and dogs. Already the world’s housecats consume more fish than all the world’s seals and we have made the cow into the largest aquatic predator on the planet because more than one half of all fish taken from the sea is converted into meal for animal feed.

We need to stop flying, stop driving cars, and jetting around on marine recreational vehicles. The Mennonites survive without cars and so can the rest of us.

Of course note how much of a hypocrite Watson is, last time I checked his boats weren’t running by sail only.

The fact of the matter is, to environmentalists, these are the kinds of “solutions” they are talking about. They want billions of people to die, so they can live in their GAIA paradise. I expect to see more and more of these eco-attacks by people like Lee. They listen to wackos like Watson, Gore, Ehrlich, and Pianka. Frankly I’m more terrified by these people than any Muslim-terrorist.

Clean Air Causes Global Warming?

April 28, 2010 2 comments

I thought people couldn’t get any stupider. I was wrong.

Could Cleaner Air Actually Intensify Global Warming?

Some scientists, he says, are confident that this is connected to global warming, but they don’t know how large the effect is. “That’s the frightening thing, because if it’s a big cooling effect, it means that we’ve been actually warming the planet more than we know,” Kintisch says. “As we take away that unexpectedly helpful cooling mask, we’re going to be facing more global warming than we expected.

“If, however, the aerosol cooling is less than we fear, then it won’t be such a big deal as we clean our air, though it will still be an effect.”

The solution, of course, isn’t to stop cutting air pollution. “We have to continue doing that, because these pollutants contribute to asthma, they contribute to respiratory diseases, they cause all sorts of health problems, and they make our environment dirty,” he says. “But there’s a variety of answers that are more sophisticated than simply continuing to pollute.”

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

I understand the science behind it. Aerosols do have a cooling effect, that’s a given. The stupidity arises from the fact that these chicken littles are the same ones that think it’s okay to blacken the sky to prevent the Global Warming Catastrophe. I say shit or get off the pot. Make up your damn mind already!

Categories: Global Warming